venture competition

Congrats to KnowledgeWare21, Pitch Competition

Congrats to Clickster team KnowledgeWare21 for being one of the ten teams accepted into the 1st Annual Pitch Contest and Demo Day for Valley Venture Mentors, hosted by BusinessWest Magazine!  WHA WHO!  

Clicksters and friends are invited to see the pitch competition live on 11/6, 2-3pm, get full details here. 

And we are delighted that our own Paul Silva will be MC'ing the event!  He is threatening to wear his Duckie Tie... pandamonium!

 

Idea: CriticalMassWeekend, take II

A few weeks ago we put forward #CriticalMassWeekend, an idea for accelerating the funding process for startups.  We are delighted to say it generated a lot of excitement and feedback, enough that we've decided to secure partners and launch a minimum viable product (MVP) version of the idea and see what we learn :).  A future post will highlight our MVP. 

This post is an iteration of the core concept: an event to help 100-1000 companies in a major metro region (like Greater Boston) go from application to signed check (for $10-$100k) in just a few days.   

Problem

The most precious resource a founder and investors have is time.  Waste too much of it and good companies can starve or amazing opportunities can be missed.  Typical sources of wasted time are:

  • Scheduling conflicts: Investor A is available, not B.  Now A is on vacation while B is in town.  When A gets back the Entrepreneur is at a tradeshow...
  • Entrepreneurs rewriting their documents to meet the specific standards of each investor group. 
  • Many investors and entrepreneurs, unfamiliar with best practices in due diligence or lacking relevant domain expertise, get hung up on the wrong questions  
  • As there is no algorithm to select good companies from bad, investors end up having to waste time evaluating 10 poor-fit opportunities for every 1 good-fit in the applicant pool.  

This wasted time forces investors and entrepreneurs to make a number of non-optimal choices.  For instance, culling the applicant pool is primarily done by how well someone can pitch vs the intrinsic value of the opportunity (which is much harder to understand in a short time).  Or decisions are made based on referrals.  Both of these systems have their merits, but they have plenty of drawbacks too.   

Meanwhile, there are a lot of people outside the traditional deal-review process who would enjoy helping evaluate opportunities... if only there was a practical way for them to get compensated for doing so. 

Solution

My experience helping run the Silvertip Awards for the Angel Capital Association showed it may be possible to create a funding process that could take an seed-stage entrepreneur from application to a check in a few days without sacrificing on due diligence quality.  

It would have to...

  1. Save everyone time by having investors publish their profiles in a highly searchable directory.  When ventures apply they must specifically apply to 1-3 investors from that directory who have relevant domain expertise.  
  2. Save investors time by having initial screening and significant due diligence data acquisition handled by a crowd of motivated students and non-contestant entrepreneurs using proven crowdsourcing technologies and processes.
  3. Save entrepreneurs time by making the application form simple super-simple.  Get their contact info, maybe an elevator pitch, and invite them to upload whatever documents they already have handy.
  4. Remove scheduling conflicts by bringing investors and entrepreneurs into the same physical space for 1-2 consecutive days for intense, structured interactions.  Make sure it's fun and engaging :).
  5. Streamline due diligence by providing all investors and entrepreneurs a standardized due diligence process based on industry best practices and with seasoned facilitators at hand.  Likewise use a standardized, published term sheet template.
  6. Recruit the crowd of students and non-contestant entrepreneurs by offering the currencies they most desire: education, reputation, and introductions.  Participation gives them an inside look at how startup investments are made.  Top performers are given privileged access to the later stages of the process, publicly recognized, and build relationships with the top investors and entrepreneurs.

Possible Implementation

Day 0 (application & orientation): Teams apply using a standardized, super-simple application form.  Meanwhile, the crowd of students (undergrad, MBA, and PhD candidates) and non-contestant entrepreneurs recruited from area colleges gather in-person for an orientation session.  

Day 1 (pre-screening): 

  • The crowd gathers in person to go through a series of intensive, structured activities using a crowdsourcing technology to filter down the applicant pool to a manageable number.  Entrepreneurs participate in person.  

Day 2 (screening):  

  • Investors arrive for a brief, in-person orientation.
  • Investors each review the ventures.  The process asks investors to start with ventures that specifically applied to them and that passed through the crowd's filter. Investors will have access to presentation videos of the teams selected by the crowd (recorded the prior day so that entrepreneurs do not need to record it separately) and the due diligence materials generated by the crowd.  
  • A series of breakout sessions allows investors to personally meet the ventures they find most interesting. Crowd members are allowed to spectate, conduct their own due diligence (online), and post their findings to the crowdsourcing platform. 
  • Each investor picks one venture to conduct due diligence on (done in concert with all other investors interested in that same venture).  All investors interested in a given venture meet to assemble a list of high-priority due diligence questions, which is then provided to the entrepreneurs.
  • The day has breaks to allow all attendees to reconnect with the outside world, network, and relax. 
  • The day also features portions where investors and entrepreneurs are segregated and provided specific content to help them continue the process efficiently (and give feedback to the event organizers).   

Day 3 (due diligence):

  • Due diligence teams meet in-person with their ventures through a series of structured, focused meetings that leverage the best practices processes and are overseen by experienced facilitators.  
  • Top performing crowd members, after signing NDAs, are invited to spectate and - at investor request - participate as a part of the due diligence team.  
  • The day has breaks to allow all attendees to reconnect with the outside world, network, and relax. 
  • The day also features portions where investors and entrepreneurs are segregated and provided specific content to help them continue the process efficiently (and give feedback to the event organizers). 
  • The day ends in an "awards ceremony" where Investments are declared and awards to top-performing crowd-members are handed out.  It should be a festive celebration.  Drinks a must! 

Idea: 3-day due diligence (#CriticalMassWeekend)

An alternative (or compliment?) to business plan competitions / accelerators.

Problem & Opportunity

Founders who have to spend a ton of time raising money are not  spending that time helping their ventures, which can hurt them pretty badly! But due diligence does take time and rushing it is a good way to make a lot of bad investments.  

Possible Solution

This blog post from Y-Combinator's Paul Graham and my experience helping run the Silvertip Awards for the Angel Capital Association got me to thinking... what if we could:

  • Offer entrepreneurs an angel-level investment process that goes from application to signed term sheet in less than a week.
  • Leverage the entrepreneurs and college students (primarily MBAs and students of entrepreneurship) to conduct filtering and accelerate due diligence.
  • Ask the angels to carve out a few days that they will dedicate  to the event. No other business, no distractions.
  • The organizers assemble all the due diligence resources the angels will need to help them move at warp speed.
  • Use highly standardized (and public) term sheets and due diligence templates. 

Sample Implementation

Day 0 (application & orientation): Teams apply using standardized application form.  Make sure the form gathers all the kind of info that tends to slow things down later such as references, any files people will need access to, etc.  Meanwhile, students recruited from area colleges gather in person for an orientation session.  

Day 1 (pre-screening): Students, gathered together in-person, go through a series of intensive, structured activities using a crowdsourcing technology to filter down the applicant pool to a manageable number.  Angels are invited to participate.

Day 2 (screening):  Angels review the presentation videos of the teams left standing and then head out to breakout sessions with the teams they find most interesting.  Students are allowed to spectate, conduct their own due diligence, and post their findings to the crowdsourcing platform.  Angels, using what they have learned in person and what they have learned from the student's research on the online platform, each pick one  venture to conduct due diligence on (done in concert with all other angels interested in that same team).  These teams are provided a detailed list of high-priority due diligence questions,

Day 3 (due diligence): Due diligence teams meet in-person with their ventures through a series of structured, focused meetings.  Students continue to spectate and participate online.  Angels might call on students who have proven themselves a savvy to actively participate in the live due diligence.  The day ends in an "awards ceremony" where investments are declared and awards to top-performing students are handed out.

Minimum Viable Product:

I believe strongly in the lean startup methodology , so here is a minimum viable product implementation that might get the ball rolling.

  • Get 3-5 angels to commit to making $2-5k grants each.
  • Focus on concept or seed-stage companies (like those that apply to UMass EI's competition or to VVM)
  • Get one MBA program (UMass? Baypath?) and/or one large entrepreneurship program to provide students (UMass EI? Baypath? Maybe the new Smith program?).
  • Don't run it as 3 consecutive days, instead split it over two consecutive weekends.  Heck, maybe the first weekend is the one right after the Grinspoon collegiate entrepreneurship conference where 500 college students gather! That way students don't miss any school :).

Love your thoughts!